Throughout history, humans have exerted their dominance over animals, and there are differing opinions on whether this is ethical or not. Some argue that using animals in various industries, such as medicine and food, is justifiable since humans are considered superior to other species. However, others believe that all creatures are entitled to equal rights and should be treated with respect. In this article, we will discuss both points of view

On one hand, supporters of using animals argue that humans are the most important beings on the planet, and other species are created to serve them. For example, animals have been used in medical research to test the safety and efficacy of drugs and treatments, which have saved many human lives. Additionally, some believe that humans have a responsibility to protect endangered species through rehabilitation programs to ensure that the ecological balance is maintained.

On the other hand, critics of using animals argue that animals have the right to live freely and should not be subjected to unnecessary industries such as fashion and food. The use of animals in such industries is considered cruel and unnecessary. Furthermore, human intervention in the environment and the domination of wildlife pose a threat to biodiversity, which can have serious consequences.

 

In conclusion, the use of animals for human benefit is an argumentative issue, and while some believe that animals should have the same rights as humans, I think it is not possible as animals do not have as much intellectual and emotional level as humans but it is necessary to protect both humans and animals